Stephen Seiler has said it on the podcast more than once: the rate at which FTP improves is inversely proportional to how long you've already been training. New cyclists make huge gains because their cardiovascular system is being shocked into adaptation. Five-year veterans grind out 1-2% per phase because every easy gain has already been made. That's not failure — that's biology.
For a first-year amateur on a structured plan with proper periodisation, 5-15% in 6-12 weeks is the typical window. Numerically, that's a 230W rider moving to 240-265W. After two or three years of consistent training, the realistic figure drops to 1-5% per dedicated 8-12 week block — and the work to deliver that gain gets harder, not easier. By the time you're at 4.0+ W/kg, you're playing for half a watt at a time.
What actually drives FTP improvement isn't more hours, it's the right intensity distribution. Seiler's research and the polarised training conversations on the Roadman Cycling Podcast point to the same conclusion — a roughly 80/20 split (zone 2 base + targeted threshold/VO2max work) consistently outperforms a 'sweet spot' or grey-zone approach for amateurs trying to break through.
Two practical implications. First, don't retest FTP every four weeks expecting it to climb every time — testing too often guarantees you'll be miscalibrated, fatigued, or both. A 6-8 week cadence is the floor. Second, if your FTP genuinely hasn't moved in 6 months despite consistent structured work, the problem is rarely 'I need to push harder' — it's almost always recovery, fuelling, or programme staleness. The Plateau Diagnostic walks through the four most common patterns.