Anthony has had this conversation with Stephen Seiler more than once on the Roadman Cycling Podcast. The 80/20 distribution — roughly 80% of training volume in zone 2 and below, 20% well above threshold — is what every elite endurance programme runs on. The mistake most masters cyclists make is thinking 'easy' means zone 3. It doesn't. Zone 2 is the pace where you can hold a full conversation, breathe through your nose, and feel like you're undertraining. That feeling is the work.
What changes after 40 is the stake. Iñigo San Millán — the coach behind Tadej Pogacar's mitochondrial work — has been clear that zone 2 is the most powerful stimulus we have for protecting mitochondrial density and fat oxidation. Both decline with age unless you train them. So a masters cyclist who skips zone 2 isn't just missing a stimulus — they're letting the engine itself shrink, then trying to layer threshold work on top of a smaller base every year.
The honest question isn't whether to do zone 2. It's how slow to go. For a 50-year-old amateur with a max HR around 175, zone 2 sits roughly between 115 and 135 bpm. By power, it's 56-75% of FTP. If your normalised power on a 'long endurance' ride is 80% of FTP, you're not in zone 2. You're in zone 3 — the grey zone — and you're paying a recovery cost you'd be better off saving for your one or two real interval sessions.
Practically, an 8-hour week for a masters rider might look like this: two endurance rides (90 minutes and 2 hours, both genuine zone 2), one threshold or VO2max session (60-75 minutes including warm-up), one strength session, and one recovery spin. That structure — heavy zone 2, one quality day, one strength day — is what the masters cohort inside Not Done Yet runs and what Wakefield and Lorang prescribe to the pros they coach. The compounding effect over six months is significant. The compounding effect over five years is the reason serious 50-year-olds still ride at the front of sportives.