What is a good FTP for a masters cyclist?

A 'good' FTP for a masters cyclist depends on age, gender, and weight. As a rough guide for trained amateur male masters cyclists, the median W/kg is approximately 3.1 at 40-44, 3.0 at 45-49, 2.8 at 50-54, 2.6 at 55-59, and 2.4 at 60+. For trained female masters cyclists the medians are roughly 0.5 W/kg lower in each band. Crossing 3.0 W/kg in the 50+ cohort puts a rider in the upper third of the trained amateur pool.

Why use age-graded FTP percentiles instead of a single benchmark?

Power-to-weight declines roughly 1% per year from age 30 if untrained, and even consistently trained masters cyclists lose some absolute output as they age. A flat W/kg ranking that puts every rider on the same scale unfairly penalises older riders against riders in their 20s. Age-graded percentiles compare you against trained amateur cyclists in your own decade, which is the comparison that actually tells you how well your training is working.

How accurate are the percentile bands?

The bands are heuristic distributions built from Coggan power profile data adjusted for amateur (non-professional) populations and the masters decline observed across published age-graded results. They are directional, not federation-grade. The goal is to give masters riders a fair sense of where they sit among trained peers, not to rank for licensing categories. Treat the result as a useful estimate, not a definitive number.

What W/kg do you need to win a masters race?

It depends on the level. Local masters races are typically won at 3.5–4.0 W/kg in the 40-49 bands and 3.2–3.7 W/kg in the 50-59 bands. National-level masters racing typically requires 4.0+ W/kg in the 40s and 3.6+ in the 50s. Power numbers don't capture skills, race-craft, or repeated-effort capacity though — riders below these numbers regularly win races by riding smarter than stronger competitors.

Should masters cyclists test FTP differently?

The protocols are the same — 20-minute test (×0.95) or ramp test — but masters cyclists should pay closer attention to recovery before testing. A poor night's sleep or a stressful work week can cost 10–15 watts on test day, which over-estimates training fatigue and under-estimates fitness. Test on a fully fresh day, in a familiar environment, and re-test no more than every 8–12 weeks.

Free Tool · Masters Cyclists

FTP BENCHMARK FOR MASTERS

Where you actually sit among trained amateur masters cyclists in your age group — not against 25-year-olds with no kids.

GENDER

AGE

Age groups: 40-44, 45-49, 50-54, 55-59, 60+. Under 40? Try the open W/kg calculator.

FTP (WATTS)

WEIGHT (KG)

MOVE UP A BAND

Coaching built around how masters cyclists actually adapt.

Polarised volume, sharper intensity, strength that protects, and recovery treated as a session. 7-day free trial. $195/month.

Apply for Coaching →

METHODOLOGY

Formula: W/kg = FTP (watts) ÷ body weight (kg). FTP should be determined from a 20-minute all-out test (×0.95) or ramp test, not estimated.

Cohort model: The percentile bands are heuristic distributions of trained amateur masters cyclists by gender and five-year age group (40-44, 45-49, 50-54, 55-59, 60+). Built from Coggan power profiling adjusted for amateur (non-professional) populations and the masters decline observed across published age-graded results. Treat as directional — the goal is a fair sense of where you sit among trained masters peers, not a federation ranking.

Limitations: W/kg predicts climbing speed but not flat-terrain performance (where absolute watts matter more). Body weight should be measured consistently (morning, before eating). FTP accuracy is the biggest variable in the result — if your last test was over three months ago, retest first.

Last updated: April 2026 · Tool version 1.0