Skip to content

EXPERT INSIGHT · REVERSE PERIODISATION

WHAT DOES STEPHEN SEILER SAY ABOUT REVERSE PERIODISATION?

Exercise physiologist, polarised training pioneer

Full profile·2 episodes·
Coaching

THE SHORT ANSWER

Seiler's research is about distribution more than sequence, and that's exactly how he frames reverse periodisation: the order you build base and intensity matters less than keeping the 80/20 split honest throughout. He's wary of any model that quietly becomes an excuse to ride grey all winter under the banner of 'intensity first'. Done properly, a reverse approach still means most of the work is easy, with a small, potent dose of genuinely hard efforts — just front-loaded in the calendar. His test is unchanged: if your easy days have crept up to moderate to support the hard blocks, the periodisation label doesn't matter, you've lost the plot.

WHO IS STEPHEN SEILER?

Stephen Seiler is the exercise physiologist who, more than any other researcher, defined how modern endurance athletes structure their training. Working from his lab at the University of Agder, he documented that elite athletes across cycling, rowing, cross-country skiing and running converge on the same intensity distribution — roughly 80% easy, 20% hard, with very little time in the middle. That observation is now known as polarised training and the 80/20 rule, and it is the framework Roadman builds every training conversation on.

SEILER ON REVERSE PERIODISATION

Seiler’s key positions on reverse periodisation.

  • Polarised training: ~80% of sessions at low intensity, ~20% at high intensity, very little time in the threshold/tempo grey zone.
  • Elite endurance athletes across disciplines converge on the same intensity distribution — it is not a coaching opinion but a measured pattern.
  • The biggest single mistake amateurs make is riding their easy days too hard, which compromises the quality of their hard days.
  • Long, slow distance is the irreplaceable foundation — high-intensity work without an aerobic base produces short-lived gains.
  • Heart rate, RPE, and lactate at sub-2 mmol/L are all reliable markers for genuine Zone 2 — power alone misses the day-to-day variation.

IN SEILER’S OWN WORDS

Verbatim from Stephen Seiler’s appearances on the podcast.

what we've seen that across Sports we've collected data from some of the best performers in the world in running in CrossCountry skiing in cycling and Rowing and so there's a bit of a universality to this that they're roughly doing about eight out of 10 sessions training sessions are essentially low stress days they're doing lots of work but they're keeping the lactate low they're in that green zone and then two to three days a week or sessions out of 10 are the more high stress

I do not know of data that has been published and subjected to peer review that shows that doing recovery rides accelerates recovery compared to sitting on the sofa. if you're really tired I say take a rest day meaning an actual rest day where you don't ride people are scared to death of that but they shouldn't be

the really good endurance athletes they may be cruising along at .7 Millar lactate whereas the average person is at 1.8 you know so they are really able to work with very low you know low turnover of lactate and so that may be you may be saving them glycogen basically

What I saw is that athlete populations from diverse sports that really weren't talking to each other or independent of each other finding the same solution to a problem to a biological challenge.

FREQUENTLY ASKED

What does Stephen Seiler say about reverse periodisation?

Seiler's research is about distribution more than sequence, and that's exactly how he frames reverse periodisation: the order you build base and intensity matters less than keeping the 80/20 split honest throughout. He's wary of any model that quietly becomes an excuse to ride grey all winter under the banner of 'intensity first'. Done properly, a reverse approach still means most of the work is easy, with a small, potent dose of genuinely hard efforts — just front-loaded in the calendar. His test is unchanged: if your easy days have crept up to moderate to support the hard blocks, the periodisation label doesn't matter, you've lost the plot.

What is Seiler's main point on reverse periodisation?

Polarised training: ~80% of sessions at low intensity, ~20% at high intensity, very little time in the threshold/tempo grey zone.

Which Roadman Cycling Podcast episodes cover Stephen Seiler on reverse periodisation?

Seiler discusses reverse periodisation in these episodes: "Secret To Cycling Fast At A Low Heart Rate | Prof Seiler", "80/20 Training to Ride Faster | Dr Stephen Seiler".