So you need to be super light for these. So the really important measurements we're looking for, it's the same measurement that everybody's talking about in Zwift and I want to mention why that's flawed as well. Parat weight ratio is just good at showing how good somebody is. A good indicator is showing how good somebody is at going uphill. And that's what these GC guys have. Your Eigen Bernals, your Pagachas, your Roglish, they're super light and they're super powerful. So when you divide their watts by their threshold power, it gives you a really big number, north of six. In contrast to that, our classics guys, our Vanderpolds, our Wilt Van Arts, they're bigger dudes, 70 plus kilogram roighters. If you take their power and the void putter weight, it's nowhere near the 6.57 that your pro gachis and your ruglitches and your out-now GC guys are doing. It's not near that. And that's why they're never going to compete and they're never going to win grand tours. But what they do have is higher weight, but higher power. So they've higher absolute power figure. Relative power to weight figure is lower, but absolute power figure is bigger. And why this is important, power to weight is what propels us when we're on going uphill. But power and coefficient of rumple drag, however we are, are the two key determinants when we're on a flat road. So not weight, yes weight's important, but it's a tertiary consideration. So it's power, CDA, and then weight. So what this means is you can take your egg and burnout who can do seven watts per kilogram, and you can put them on a flat road beside Machuveanderpole or a short climb, and he's not gonna be able to match them because absolute power matters so much. So what we have is Reuters focusing on where their relative strength is. We've the super skinny, high-perit weight ratio guys focusing on grand tours, your Chris Frooms, Eigenbarnals and we have your classics Reuters, typically your bigger bill gois and they're focusing on one day flatter races with punchy climbs. So short climbs where the absolute power still gives them a relative advantage. Now the second thing to consider is timing because some Reuters train true races to get ready for events later in the season. Like if Eigenbarnal went all in and trained for Tour of Flanders, it's different than if he's training true Tour of Landers to get preparation for the year of the Talia. So, how this works and I will do a full podcast on how to peek because I think it's an interesting topic. We're building up fitness each day and we assign a score to our training. So, every day we assign a training, a training stress score, it's called TSS score to our training. And this is a function of how hard you can go for one hour. So, I'm not going of the other stuff. I'm going to do this justice on a roadman boy's podcast, but to simplify it. So if I ride full gas for one hour, I get assigned a TSS score of 100. So now everything becomes a function of this. If I ride 50% intensity for two hours, I also achieve 100. So training stress score is the metric we use for assessing how difficult a session is. Now how we graph fitness is we take that TSS score and we map it over a 42 day running total and we have, you know, based off previous seasons, we'll have an idea where we want somebody's fitness to get to by a certain date. So if I'm targeting the Tour de France in July, my fitness is in a very different place in April than if I'm targeting the Tour of Flanders, which is in April because the Tour of Flanders, I'm approaching peak fitness for my event, whereas if I'm the same roider who is going for the Tour de France, he's going to have a much lower fitness score in April than he is going to have in July. So it's getting to your peak fitness score at the time of your event. If your event is further in the season, you're going to have a slower start to the season. If your event is near to the beginning of the season, you're typically going to have a bigger winter buildup. So your fit are for these earlier races. And I'll go in there in full podcast because that's, to be honest, it's quite a confusing topic.