Skip to content
CoachingQUESTION

HOW MANY HARD RIDES PER WEEK FOR MASTERS CYCLISTS?

BEST FOR

Cyclists 40+ structuring a typical training week and trying to balance intensity against recovery.

NOT FOR

Pre-event peak weeks where intensity may temporarily increase under coach supervision.

The most common masters training mistake Anthony hears about on the podcast is too much hard work. Riders feel guilty doing easy rides, equate fatigue with progress, and end up doing four or five 'hard' rides a week — none of which are properly hard, and all of which prevent recovery. The result is a permanent state of grey-zone fatigue and a flat FTP.

Two hard sessions a week is the right answer for almost every masters cyclist. The polarised model Stephen Seiler describes works even better with age, not worse — because the recovery cost of true high-intensity work is higher, you do it less often but make each session count. Typically that's one threshold session and one VO2max or repeated-effort session, with everything else either zone 2 endurance or full recovery.

Three hard sessions a week is the upper limit, and only sustainable for short blocks (4-6 weeks) under careful recovery management. The third session pushes total weekly stress significantly, and most masters cyclists trying to hold three for longer than 6 weeks end up with elevated resting HR, falling HRV, and stalled gains. Any coach Anthony has interviewed will say the same — three is a ceiling, not a target.

Four hard sessions a week is overtraining, full stop. There's no version of this that works for an amateur masters athlete training 8-12 hours a week. The body cannot recover, the quality of each session degrades, and the fitness gains that would have come from two well-recovered sessions are forfeited. The masters cyclists who keep gaining year-over-year are the ones who do less hard work, but more recovery and more strength.

EVIDENCE

WHERE THIS COMES FROM

  • Stephen Seiler — Polarised Training

    Seiler's research on intensity distribution argues for low-frequency, high-quality hard sessions — particularly applicable to masters athletes.

  • Dan Lorang — Roadman Podcast

    Lorang has emphasised the recovery-cost framing of hard sessions: each one must be 'paid for' with adequate recovery before another can be earned.

  • Roadman — Common Training Mistakes

    Synthesis of mistakes Anthony has heard repeatedly across 1,400+ podcast episodes — too many hard sessions ranks at the top.

FAQ

COMMON FOLLOW-UPS

What counts as a 'hard' ride?

Anything at threshold or above for sustained intervals — think 4×8 minutes at 105% FTP, 5×4 minutes at VO2max, race-pace efforts, or hard group rides where you're frequently above threshold. A 'sweet spot' or tempo ride is closer to medium-hard and shouldn't be counted as one of your two true hard sessions.

Is a long zone 2 ride a hard ride?

No — even a 4-hour zone 2 ride is not 'hard' in the recovery-cost sense. It's high-volume but low-intensity. Long endurance rides build the aerobic base that supports hard work, but they don't draw down recovery the way threshold or VO2max sessions do.

Can I do 3 hard rides a week if I sleep well?

For short blocks, yes — typically 4-6 weeks, with strong recovery between sessions and a clear deload at the end. As a year-round pattern for an amateur masters cyclist, three hard sessions a week is unsustainable for almost everyone Anthony has spoken to on the podcast.

RELATED QUESTIONS

STILL FIGURING IT OUT?

A coach removes the guesswork.

Apply for Coaching