In 1999, Marco Pantani was leading the Giro d'Italia by five minutes and thirty-eight seconds.
He had won the previous day's stage at Madonna di Campiglio by a clear margin. He was wearing the maglia rosa, the pink jersey of the race leader. There were two stages left to ride before the finish in Milan — one mountain stage to Aprica, then the flat run-in to the Piazza del Duomo. The mountain stage was a climber's stage. Pantani was the best climber in the race that year. He was the best climber in the world that year. By every reasonable measure, he was about to win his second Giro in two years.
At 7:46 on the morning of 5 June 1999, three UCI doctors entered Pantani's hotel room at the Hotel Touring in Madonna di Campiglio. They took blood from him and from the other top-ten riders in the race. The samples were carried roughly a kilometre to a different building, the Hotel Majestic, where the analysis was done. Pantani's hematocrit reading came back at 52 percent. The UCI threshold was 50.
By lunchtime, he had been removed from the race. By the end of the day, he had walked out of the Hotel Touring past the cameras and the journalists and the policemen and said the only thing he ever said in public about that morning. "M'hanno fregato." They screwed me.
Five years later, on Valentine's Day 2004, Marco Pantani was found dead in a hotel room in Rimini.
The official version — failed test, broken man, accidental cocaine overdose — has been the official version for twenty-two years. In late 2022, the Italian Parliament's anti-mafia commission published a long report describing the testing that morning as conducted with "numerous and grave violations of the rules". In July 2024, a prosecutor in Trento reopened the file. As of 2026, both the file on the 1999 test and the file on the 2004 death are officially open.
This piece walks through what the documents now say.
Listen to the full solo episode of the Roadman Cycling Podcast →
Who Marco Pantani Was Before That Morning
He was born on 13 January 1970 in the coastal town of Cesenatico, in Emilia-Romagna, the son of a plumber. The story the Italian press never tired of repeating was that his father gave him one year to make it as a professional cyclist before he had to come home and take over the family business. He did not need a year.
By 1992 he had won the amateur Giro. By 1994, in his second professional Grand Tour, he had finished second behind Eugeni Berzin and ahead of Miguel Induráin, who at that point was the most dominant rider on Earth. The Italian newspapers gave him a nickname before he had really won anything — Il Pirata, the Pirate, for the bandana, the earrings, the shaved head, the way he looked nothing like anyone else in the peloton.
He climbed nothing like anyone else either. Most riders climb sitting down. Pantani climbed out of the saddle, hands on the drops like a sprinter, the position you take when you intend to throw everything you have onto the road in front of you. Some of the times he set on the Alpe d'Huez, on the Mortirolo, on Les Deux Alpes still stand.
In October 1995, on the descent at Milano-Torino, the police failed to close a junction properly and a car wandered onto the course. Pantani hit it head-on. He fractured his tibia and his fibula on his left leg. The bones were held together with a metal splint. His left leg was permanently shorter than his right. Most people thought he was finished.
He came back. In 1997 he won two Tour de France stages and finished third overall. In 1998 he won the Giro d'Italia, beating Pavel Tonkov in the mountains. And six weeks later he did the thing Italians born after 1998 still talk about as if they remember it.
On 27 July 1998, stage 15 of the Tour de France, Galibier to Les Deux Alpes. Pantani was sitting fourth on general classification, three minutes behind Jan Ullrich. The day was 4°C and raining. Pantani attacked with six kilometres of the Galibier still to climb. He took what was left of the breakaway with him on the descent and dropped them again on the final climb. He crossed the line at Les Deux Alpes almost nine minutes ahead of Ullrich. He took the yellow jersey on a single afternoon. The next morning, L'Équipe ran the headline "Pantani Au Plus Haut Des Cieux" — Pantani in the highest of heavens. A French sports newspaper had reached for a religious phrase to describe a cyclist.
He won the Tour. He became only the seventh rider in cycling history to win the Giro and the Tour in the same season. That is who Marco Pantani was when he woke up at the Hotel Touring on the morning of 5 June 1999.
What The Numbers Show
The test that morning was the third UCI hematocrit test of the 1999 Giro. Pantani had passed the first two. The UCI did not have a test for EPO in 1999 — the drug that had defined the previous decade of cycling existed without a measurement that could detect it directly. What the federation measured instead was hematocrit, the percentage of your blood made up of red blood cells. A reading above 50 percent triggered a two-week suspension. They called it a health test. Everybody knew what it was actually for.
The samples on 5 June were drawn at the Hotel Touring at 7:46. They were carried roughly a kilometre to a different building, the Hotel Majestic, where the analysis was done.
The reading came back at 52 percent. Two points over.
Three other readings frame that result.
The night before the test, in his hotel room, Pantani had checked his own hematocrit on a small centrifuge of the kind a number of teams kept on their buses in that era. The reading was 48 percent.
Two readings later that day, at a UCI-accredited hospital in Imola — Pantani drove there himself after leaving the race — returned 47.6 percent and 48.1 percent.
So: 48 the night before. 48 a few hours after. And in between, at 7:46 in a hotel room in the Italian Alps, the precise moment that mattered, 52.
What happened in those few hours has been the question hanging over Italian cycling for twenty-seven years.
What The 2022 Anti-Mafia Commission Report Found
For two decades, the question went unanswered in any official capacity. The original UCI test was upheld. Pantani was charged with sporting fraud in Italy. He was acquitted, but not because the test was found to be wrong — because doping was not yet a criminal offence under Italian law in 1999.
In late 2022, the Italian Parliament's anti-mafia commission published the findings of a long inquiry. They had reviewed the chain of custody for the blood sample. They had reviewed the doctors' testimony. They had reviewed every protocol that was supposed to have been followed that morning. Their conclusion was that the test had been conducted with — these are their words — "numerous and grave violations of the rules".
What kind of violations? The blood drawn at the Hotel Touring was carried to the Hotel Majestic for analysis. That movement is not in itself a violation. But it created a window — by some accounts an hour long — in which the sample was not under continuous observed custody. And when blood is drawn into a tube and left to settle, the red cells fall to the bottom and the platelets and white cells drift up. A reading taken from the lower portion of a settled tube produces a higher hematocrit number than properly mixed blood would.
The commission's hematologist found a procedural signature. Pantani's morning sample showed unusually low platelet levels. His Imola samples did not. According to the expert testimony in the report, that pattern is what you would expect from a sample drawn from the lower, settled portion of a tube — the part with concentrated red cells, but not the part with the platelets.
The commission did not conclude that the result had been manipulated. It concluded that the process that produced the result had failed to meet its own standards.
This is the point at which the standard reading of the Pantani story stops working. The test was not a clean test. The procedural failure is in the published record. What the commission could not, and did not, do was establish whether the failures were deliberate or simply negligent.
The Elephant In The Room
There is a reading of this story that wants to make Pantani an innocent victim. The documentary record does not support it.
He raced through the most heavily doped era in cycling history. There was no UCI test for EPO and a generation of riders were using it. Italian prosecutors investigating the Ferrara biomedical institute associated with Professor Francesco Conconi — a researcher later described by an Italian judge as "morally guilty" of promoting doping, although acquitted in the criminal trial — recovered records that appeared to track athletes' hematocrit values through the early 1990s. Pantani's name was on those records.
When he was hospitalised after the 1995 Milano-Torino crash, his hematocrit on admission was reported in the Italian press at 60.1 percent. That is not a number a clean rider produces.
The argument the documents now support is therefore not that Pantani was clean. It is narrower. It is that on a single morning in June 1999, with the favourite about to win the race, the rules that should have governed his test were not followed — and that the question of who benefited from that procedural failure has now, twenty-five years later, finally got the attention of an Italian anti-mafia prosecutor.
These two things can be true at the same time. Pantani was almost certainly part of the system. Pantani was also, on that specific morning, removed from a race he was about to win on the basis of a test that did not meet its own standards. That is the part of cycling history nobody wants to look at because it does not produce a tidy ending.
What Happened After Madonna
Pantani was twenty-nine years old. He was at the peak of his earning power. He was a national hero. His mother, Tonina, has always said he was a different person from that morning on.
He raced again in July 2000. In what became the most replayed sequence of his late career, he attacked Lance Armstrong on the final climb of Mont Ventoux. Armstrong sat on his wheel up most of the climb and gifted him the stage win. Pantani was furious afterwards. He had spent his career building a reputation as a rider who could hurt himself more than anyone else. The American had taken the stage from him without giving him the chance to do that.
A few stages later he abandoned the Tour with stomach cramps. He never won another Grand Tour stage.
By his own ex-girlfriend's account, the cocaine started in the months after Madonna. In 2003, he overdosed on cocaine four times. There is a single photograph from November 2000 of his Mercedes parked on top of another vehicle after he crashed into eight cars in one hour. He was admitted to psychiatric care in 2003. His final professional race was the 2003 Giro d'Italia. He finished a muted fourteenth.
In an interview not long before he died, Pantani told an Italian journalist: "Today, I don't associate cycling with winning. I associate it with terrible things that have happened to me and the people close to me."
Rimini, 14 February 2004
On Valentine's Day 2004, in a residence called Le Rose in Rimini, about thirty kilometres down the coast from Cesenatico, Marco Pantani was found dead. He had checked into room D5 alone. The door was blocked from the inside with furniture. The windows were closed from the inside. The autopsy listed cerebral oedema and heart failure. The cause of death was acute cocaine poisoning. He was thirty-four.
If the story ended there, this would be a different piece. It would be a piece about a great athlete and a tragic fall. The documentary trail does not end there.
In the years since 2004, Pantani's mother has refused to accept what happened in Rimini was a simple overdose. She has, with a stubbornness that has outlasted multiple prosecutors and three separate investigations, kept the file alive.
In 2014 the family lawyer presented Italian prosecutors with new material. La Repubblica reported that Pantani's body had shown signs consistent with a struggle. La Gazzetta dello Sport ran the headline "Pantani Was Killed And Forced To Drink Cocaine". The theory presented to the Rimini prosecutor was that Pantani had let someone into his room early that morning, that he had been attacked, that he had been forced to drink water dosed with a lethal quantity of cocaine, and that the disordered state of the room was staged afterwards.
In 2015 the Rimini chief prosecutor closed that investigation. The room had been blocked from the inside. The windows had been closed from the inside. There was no evidence pointing to anyone other than Pantani himself. His conclusion was that the death was, on balance, voluntary suicide caused by accidental excessive intake of cocaine. A judge in Rimini archived the case in 2016.
In 2019, after submissions from the family lawyers and from the parliamentary anti-mafia commission, the case was reopened for a third time.
In July 2024, something else happened.
The 2024 Trento File
A different Italian prosecutor, working in Trento, opened a new investigation. Not into the 2004 death. Into the test that morning at Madonna, twenty-five years earlier.
On 12 July 2024 the prosecutor went to a prison outside Milan to question one of the most senior living figures in Italian organised-crime history. The witness — speaking in connection with a clandestine betting network — has spoken publicly about Pantani in the past, but his statements had never formed the spine of an active criminal investigation.
The account on the prosecution file reads as follows. Long before June 1999, it was known among certain Italian criminal circles that Pantani would be removed from the Giro before it reached Milan. There was a clandestine betting network whose books were heavily exposed against him. According to one witness whose name has been withheld, if Pantani had won that Giro, the network would have had to pay several billion lire and risk bankruptcy.
A second witness in the death file itself, Fabio Miradossa — one of the men prosecuted for supplying cocaine to Pantani — testified before Italian magistrates that, in his view, Pantani had been murdered. He spoke about Pantani's interactions with him in the months before the death and described a man who was, in his words, in search of the truth about what had happened that morning at Madonna.
A taxi driver in Rimini, questioned during the third investigation, claimed he had driven two women to Le Rose on the night Pantani died and picked them up later wearing different clothes from those they had arrived in.
None of this is proof of anything. The Italian investigators have been clear about that. The 2024 Trento file is what Italian law calls a Modello 44 — an investigation without a named suspect or a formal charge. It is the legal instrument used when something needs to be examined officially without anyone yet being accused. As of 2026, the file is open.
Why This Story Is Still Open
There are two questions on the file in 2026.
The first is what happened that morning in the Hotel Touring. The procedural failures the anti-mafia commission identified are in the documentary record. Whether the failures were negligent or deliberate is the open question. The Trento file is the legal vehicle for trying to answer it.
The second is what happened in room D5 at Le Rose on 14 February 2004. The Rimini prosecutor's office concluded in 2015 that the death was, on balance, voluntary. The case has been opened, closed, archived, and reopened a further three times since. The mother's challenge to the official version has not been put aside.
Cycling's official record has spent twenty-seven years agreeing on what happened that morning at Madonna. The Italian state has, very slowly, been arriving at a different reading. Both readings can be true at once. Pantani was probably guilty of one thing and was made to pay for an entire era on a morning when the rules were not followed, and where the question of who benefited from that morning has now, twenty-five years later, got the attention of the anti-mafia prosecutors. Whether the network reached into the hotel room that morning and put a hand on the scale is a question two Italian prosecutors are actively investigating. The answer may be that they did. The answer may be that the procedural failures that day were just procedural failures. The file is open precisely because that answer is not yet known.
For the cycling fan who came of age on the 1998 Tour, on the rider in the rain on the Galibier, on the bandana flapping on Les Deux Alpes, the second version of the story is the one most people have not heard. It is also, on the evidence of the documents now in the public domain, the version closer to what the Italian state currently believes.
What This Means For Cycling Now
There are two reasons this story matters beyond Italian cycling history.
The first is the procedural reading. The hematocrit health test the UCI used in the late 1990s was a workaround for a drug it could not measure directly. The federation knew the test was a proxy. It also knew the procedural standards required to make a proxy test fair. On 5 June 1999, by the published record of an Italian parliamentary commission, those standards were not met. Whatever cycling does next about athlete welfare, anti-doping, and the integrity of its tests, the lesson of that morning has not been fully absorbed. The whistle-clean version of the story — Pantani failed, the system worked — does not survive the documentary record.
The second is the cultural reading. Cycling has a long history of producing tragic figures and then forgetting how those figures actually ended. Tom Simpson on Mont Ventoux. Frank Vandenbroucke in a hotel room in Senegal. Pantani in room D5 at Le Rose. The pattern is not coincidence. The sport asks a particular kind of person to do a particular kind of work, and when the work breaks them, the sport's instinct has too often been to clean up the story afterwards.
For the Roadman audience — serious amateur cyclists who care about the craft of the sport — the relevant question is what to take from a story like this. Two things, perhaps. The first is that cycling history is rarely a settled matter. The second is that the people who made the sport what it is, on the road and off it, deserved better than the version of their story that ended up in print. The work of reading the documentary record honestly is part of taking the sport seriously.
If the broader business of how the EPO generation actually worked from inside is interesting, the Tyler Hamilton companion blog on US Postal and the Trek and LeMond doping dispute piece are the natural follow-ups. For the parallel question about what cycling has been willing to police and what it has not, the hidden motors and mechanical doping piece covers the same set of structural questions in a different decade.
Listen To The Full Episode
The full conversation — the Madonna timeline, the Imola counter-tests, the 2022 commission findings, the Trento prosecutor's file, the Rimini autopsy, and the four reopened investigations — is on the Roadman Cycling Podcast.
Marco Pantani was born on 13 January 1970 in Cesenatico. He died on 14 February 2004 in Rimini. The investigation into how and why is open as of the time this was written.
