Skip to content
Coaching18 min read

CADENCE TRAINING FOR CYCLISTS: DRILLS, NEUROMUSCULAR EFFICIENCY, AND WHEN TO SPIN VS GRIND

By anthony-walsh

WHO THIS IS FOR

IS THIS YOU?

  • A cyclist who has pedalled at the same self-selected cadence for years and never trained it deliberately
  • A masters rider noticing their legs fatigue earlier than they used to and wondering whether cadence is part of the answer
  • A climber who grinds at 60 rpm on every hill and wonders why they cramp in the final kilometres
  • A racer who wants to spin more efficiently in a bunch and respond to accelerations without blowing up

THE ROADMAN VIEW

The Roadman View

  • Here's the thing — most of us have a cadence, but very few of us have actually trained it. I see riders stuck at 82 rpm out of pure habit when their legs could handle 92 if they'd spent a few weeks doing the drills. That's the difference between fighting the pedals and flowing with them.
  • I get asked about the Contador vs Froome spinner-versus-grinder thing all the time. It's misleading. Both adjusted cadence to gradient and effort — the best climbers use the full range, not one fixed gear.
  • If you're a masters rider, this one matters. I've seen neuromuscular speed decline sharply in riders who never train it. High-cadence drills aren't just for track sprinters — they're how you keep the legs sharp as you get older.

Most cyclists have a cadence. Few have trained it. There is a material difference between self-selecting 82 rpm because that is where your legs settled ten years ago and choosing 92 rpm because your neuromuscular system can produce power there efficiently. The first is a habit. The second is a skill — and skills respond to practice.

The optimal cadence guide covers what cadence to target and why the research favours 85–95 rpm for most riders. This post is about something different: how to train the full cadence spectrum so you can use any part of it when the road demands it. High-cadence spin-ups for neuromuscular speed. Low-cadence torque work for climbing strength. And the drills that sit between the two, building the coordination that turns raw fitness into clean, efficient pedalling.

Run your current numbers through the cadence calculator before you start. You need a baseline — not because one number defines you, but because you cannot train a range if you do not know where you are starting from.

Why Cadence Is a Trainable Skill

Cadence is not a fixed trait. It is a motor pattern — a learned coordination between your central nervous system, your muscle fibres, and the mechanical system of the bicycle. Change the input signals and the pattern changes with them.

The nervous system controls how many motor units fire, how quickly they fire, and how smoothly the left and right legs alternate through the pedal stroke. A rider who has only ever pedalled at 78 rpm has a nervous system calibrated for 78 rpm. Ask that rider to hold 105 rpm for two minutes and the result is predictable: the hips bounce, the upper body rocks, the power trace looks like a seismograph. Not because the legs cannot move that fast, but because the neural wiring has not been trained to coordinate at that speed.

This is the distinction that matters. Cardiovascular fitness determines how much oxygen you can deliver. Muscular strength determines how much force you can produce. But neuromuscular efficiency — how cleanly and economically your nervous system orchestrates the pedal stroke — determines how much of that fitness and strength actually reaches the pedals. Train it, and the same engine produces more usable power. Ignore it, and you leave watts on the table at every cadence outside your narrow comfort zone.

What the World Tour Coaches Prescribe

The best coaches in professional cycling treat cadence as a variable to be trained, not a number to be fixed. John Wakefield — founder of Science to Sport and Director of Coaching and Sports Science at Red Bull–Bora–Hansgrohe — programmes specific cadence blocks into his riders' periodisation. The intent is not to find one ideal RPM but to widen the range within which a rider can produce power efficiently.

Tim Kerrison's work with Team Sky (now Ineos Grenadiers) took this further during the Froome era. Froome's high-cadence climbing style — 95–100 rpm up Alpine passes where rivals sat at 75–80 — was not some innate preference. It was trained. Kerrison identified that Froome's physiology responded better to cardiovascular loading than to muscular loading, then built a cadence-specific programme around that finding. The result was a climbing style that looked effortless at RPMs that would have most amateurs gasping within three minutes.

Dan Lorang, who has worked with some of the strongest climbers in the modern peloton, has spoken about prescribing low-cadence torque work during base phases specifically to develop the muscular endurance that riders need when the gradient forces cadence down. His approach is pragmatic: train the ends of the spectrum deliberately, and the middle — where racing happens — takes care of itself.

The common thread across all three coaches is this: cadence work is prescribed, periodised, and progressed, not left to chance.

Cadence Ranges by Terrain and Effort Type

Before you design cadence-specific sessions, you need a framework for what to target and when. This is not prescriptive — individual variation matters — but it reflects the ranges that most trained cyclists operate within.

Flat and rolling terrain

Target: 88–95 rpm at endurance to tempo intensity. This is the bread and butter. Most riders should spend the bulk of their training hours here. If you are consistently below 85 rpm on flat roads, your default cadence is probably too low, and you are burning through muscular endurance that you will want later in the ride. Use the cadence calculator to compare your current average against the target range for your riding profile.

Sustained climbs (5–20 minutes)

Target: 75–85 rpm, depending on gradient and gearing. Cadence drops naturally as the road tilts up — gravity slows the wheel, the gear gets harder, and each pedal stroke demands more force. The mistake most amateurs make is letting cadence drop too far. Grinding at 60 rpm on a 6% gradient is not economical; it is a muscular endurance leak. If your gearing does not let you hold 75 rpm on your local climbs, the fix is a wider-range cassette, not more suffering. For the full picture on climbing RPM, see the best cadence for climbing guide.

Threshold and VO2max intervals

Target: 90–100 rpm for threshold work; 95–105 rpm for VO2max efforts. Higher power outputs suit slightly higher cadences because the alternative — the same power at lower cadence — means very high force per stroke, which fatigues Type II fibres rapidly. Know your power zones and match cadence to intensity.

Sprinting and short accelerations

Target: 110–130 rpm. Sprint power is a product of force and velocity. The ability to sustain a high cadence under maximal force — without the pedal stroke falling apart — separates riders who can sprint from riders who just push a big gear. This is almost entirely a neuromuscular skill.

High-Cadence Drills: Building Neuromuscular Speed

High-cadence work trains three things simultaneously: the speed at which motor units fire, the smoothness of the transition between left and right leg, and the stability of the pelvis at RPMs above your normal range. All three contribute to what coaches call pedalling efficiency — and all three degrade with age if they are not specifically maintained.

Session 1: Spin-Ups

Where: Flat road or trainer, small gear. Protocol: From a comfortable cadence (~90 rpm), gradually increase RPM over 30 seconds until you reach the point where your hips begin to bounce. Hold that cadence for 5 seconds, then ease off. Recovery: 2 minutes easy spinning. Repeats: 6–8. Objective: Find and gradually extend your ceiling. Most riders discover their bounce point sits around 115–120 rpm initially. After four weeks of consistent spin-ups, that ceiling often moves above 130 rpm.

Session 2: High-Cadence Blocks

Where: Flat road or trainer, moderate gear. Protocol: 1 minute at 105–110 rpm, followed by 1 minute at self-selected cadence. Alternate for 10–20 minutes within an endurance ride. Power: Zone 2 — this is not a power session. The constraint is cadence, not watts. Heart rate: Expect heart rate to sit 5–8 bpm higher than normal at the same power. That is the cardiovascular cost of spinning faster. It settles as coordination improves. Objective: Build the ability to sustain elevated cadence without the upper body compensating. If your shoulders are rising or your hips are rocking, the cadence is too high for your current coordination. Drop 5 rpm and build from there.

Session 3: Over-Under Cadence Intervals

Where: Flat road or trainer. Protocol: 2 minutes at 100–105 rpm, then 2 minutes at 75–80 rpm. Alternate for 20 minutes. Power: Steady tempo (76–90% FTP). Use the FTP zone calculator for your numbers. Objective: Train the nervous system to shift between cadence ranges without losing pedalling quality. This is the session that transfers most directly to racing, where the road and the bunch dictate constant cadence changes.

Progression over 6 weeks

Weeks 1–2: Spin-ups only (Session 1), twice per week. Learning the movement pattern. Weeks 3–4: Add high-cadence blocks (Session 2), once per week within an endurance ride. Continue spin-ups. Weeks 5–6: Introduce over-under cadence intervals (Session 3), once per week. Drop spin-ups to once per week as a warm-up drill.

Low-Cadence Torque Work: Building Muscular Strength on the Bike

The other end of the spectrum. While high-cadence drills build speed and coordination, low-cadence torque intervals build the raw muscular endurance that climbing demands. The Hebisz study (2024) showed that low-cadence intervals at 50–70 rpm produced 8.7% VO2max gains compared to 4.6% at freely chosen cadence over an identical eight-week programme — a result that confirmed what Wakefield and others had been prescribing for years.

Session 4: Seated Torque Intervals

Where: A climb of 4–7% gradient. Outdoors is strongly preferred — ERG mode on a trainer changes the feel of low-cadence work in ways that most riders find unpleasant and biomechanically different. Protocol: 4 minutes at 55–65 rpm, RPE 7/10, seated throughout. Power: 85–95% FTP. Recovery: 4 minutes easy spinning back down. Repeats: 3–5. Objective: Recruit Type II fibres under sustained aerobic load. The moderate intensity is deliberate — this is not a maximal effort. The adaptation comes from forcing larger motor units to work aerobically for extended periods.

Session 5: Extended Torque Blocks

Where: A longer climb (10+ minutes) at 4–7%. Protocol: 8–10 minutes at 50–60 rpm, RPE 6–7/10. Power: 80–90% FTP. Recovery: 5 minutes easy. Repeats: 2–3. Objective: Build the specific endurance for long climbs where cadence drops through fatigue or gradient. This session mimics the last 30 minutes of a mountain stage — the part where legs start to fail and only the riders who have trained force production at low cadence can still produce meaningful power.

The progression (and the warning)

Start at 65 rpm and work down toward 50 rpm over six to eight weeks. Do not skip steps. The forces through the knee, the Achilles tendon, and the connective tissue of the hip are substantially higher at low cadence, and the tissue needs time to adapt. Two torque sessions per week is the ceiling for most amateur riders. Three is too many. If you feel any sharp or persistent knee pain, stop immediately and reassess — the cadence-by-age guide covers the joint-load considerations in detail.

The Contador-Froome Divide: Spinner vs Grinder on Climbs

The image persists: Froome spinning at 100 rpm up Ventoux while Contador drives a bigger gear at 70 rpm. Spinner versus grinder. Choose your camp.

Except neither rider was locked into one style. Telemetry from professional races tells a more nuanced story. Froome's average climbing cadence on long Alpine stages sat around 93–97 rpm — high, but not the 100+ that television close-ups suggested. On steep pitches above 10%, he dropped to 80–85 rpm. On accelerations, he sometimes surged above 105 rpm to create separation, using the cardiovascular burst that high cadence demands as a weapon against rivals who were already muscularly fatigued.

Contador's climbing cadence averaged 80–88 rpm on most stages — lower than Froome, but not the slow grind of popular memory. On his famous attacks — the explosive, out-of-the-saddle surges — his cadence spiked above 95 rpm. The image of Contador grinding away is partly an artefact of where cameras pointed.

The lesson for amateurs is not that one style is superior. It is that both riders had trained the full spectrum and deployed different cadences tactically. Froome chose high cadence because Kerrison had identified it as physiologically optimal for him. Contador preferred a lower baseline but shifted when the race demanded it. Neither was a prisoner of a single RPM.

What you can take from this: if you can only produce power cleanly at one cadence, you have a vulnerability. A steep ramp forces cadence down. A flat false-flat after a summit rewards those who can spin back up quickly. The rider who can operate at 75 rpm and 100 rpm — and transition between them without losing power — has more tactical options than the rider who is tethered to 82 rpm regardless of terrain.

Cadence and Knee Health for Masters Cyclists

If you are over 40, cadence is not just a performance variable. It is a joint-health variable. The force through the patellofemoral joint on each pedal stroke is directly proportional to the torque you are producing — and torque is inversely related to cadence at any given power output. Pedal at 70 rpm and 200 watts, and each stroke transmits roughly 30% more force through the knee than the same 200 watts at 90 rpm.

For a 25-year-old with healthy cartilage and resilient tendons, that difference might not matter across a three-hour ride. For a 48-year-old whose cartilage has been thinning for two decades and whose tendons recover more slowly from microtrauma, it matters considerably. The accumulation of higher peak forces, repeated thousands of times per ride, is a mechanism for overuse injury that is entirely avoidable by maintaining a moderate-to-high cadence.

This does not mean avoiding all low-cadence work. Torque intervals, dosed at two sessions per week with proper progression, are valuable for masters riders — they build muscular endurance and force production capacity that you lose faster with age than you lose aerobic fitness. But your default cadence for everyday riding should sit at 85–95 rpm, not 75–80 rpm. The heart can handle the higher cardiovascular cost. The knees struggle with the alternative.

There is a second age-related consideration. Neuromuscular speed — the rate at which your nervous system can fire motor units — declines from your late thirties onward if it is not maintained through specific training. A masters cyclist who never does high-cadence work will find, gradually, that their comfortable cadence drifts downward year on year. Not because of fitness loss, but because the neural pathways that support fast, coordinated pedalling are atrophying from disuse. High-cadence spin-ups once or twice a week are the antidote. Think of them as neural maintenance — the cycling equivalent of keeping your reaction times sharp.

Cadence on the Trainer vs the Road

A brief note on where to do this work, because it matters more than most riders assume.

High-cadence drills transfer well to the trainer. The controlled resistance and fixed position make it easier to isolate the coordination challenge without worrying about traffic or road surface. Spin-ups on a smart trainer with cadence display are an efficient use of a 60-minute indoor session during the week — and the complete indoor training setup guide covers how to get your pain cave dialled so those sessions run smoothly.

Low-cadence torque work is a different story. Most riders and coaches — Wakefield included — prefer torque intervals on a real climb. The feel of natural resistance against the gradient is qualitatively different from ERG mode holding a target wattage at low cadence. On a climb, the resistance is constant and predictable. In ERG mode, the trainer adjusts resistance dynamically as cadence fluctuates, and riders consistently report that the sensation is one of the trainer "fighting back" — a subtle difference that changes the muscular recruitment pattern and makes the session harder to execute cleanly. If you have access to a 4–7% gradient within riding distance, use it for torque intervals. Save the trainer for spin-ups and high-cadence blocks.

Putting It Together: A Cadence Training Block

Here is how cadence work fits into a typical training week for a masters cyclist riding eight to twelve hours. This is not a standalone programme — it layers into your existing structure alongside endurance rides, interval sessions, and recovery.

Weekly structure (build phase)

Monday: Rest or active recovery. Tuesday: Key session — torque intervals (Session 4). Warm up 20 minutes with progressive efforts, then 4 × 4 minutes at 55–65 rpm on a 5% climb, 4 minutes recovery between efforts. Cool down 15 minutes. Wednesday: Endurance ride with high-cadence blocks embedded (Session 2). 90 minutes Zone 2 with 6 × 1 minute at 105–110 rpm interspersed every 12–15 minutes. Thursday: Recovery spin or rest. Friday: Key session — over-under cadence intervals (Session 3). After 20-minute warm-up, alternate 2 minutes at 100 rpm / 2 minutes at 75 rpm for 20 minutes at tempo power. Follow with steady endurance to fill the ride. Saturday: Long endurance ride, self-selected cadence. Pay attention to where cadence sits naturally — this tells you whether the drill work is transferring. Sunday: Group ride or moderate intensity. Use climbing sections to practise holding 75–85 rpm rather than letting cadence drop below 70 rpm.

What to measure

Track three numbers across the block:

  1. Average cadence on endurance rides. If it drifts upward by 3–5 rpm over six weeks without conscious effort, the neuromuscular work is transferring.
  2. Spin-up ceiling. The RPM at which your hips start to bounce during Session 1 drills. Progress here means improved coordination.
  3. Power at low cadence. Can you hold the same percentage of FTP at 55 rpm as at 90 rpm? If the gap narrows, your torque capacity is improving. Check both numbers against the power-speed calculator to see how that translates on the road.

Common Mistakes

Treating cadence drills as power sessions. High-cadence blocks at Zone 2 are not easy because the power is low — they are hard because the coordination demand is high. Adding power on top of that defeats the purpose. Separate the stimulus: cadence work trains the nervous system, not the engine.

Skipping the progression on torque work. Starting at 50 rpm in week one because "lower is better" is how you end up with patellar tendonitis in week three. Start at 65 rpm. Earn the lower numbers over two months.

Only training one end of the spectrum. A rider who does nothing but spin-ups develops coordination without strength. A rider who does nothing but torque intervals develops force without the neural speed to use it at race cadence. You need both.

Ignoring cadence on recovery rides. Recovery rides at 60–70 rpm in a big gear are not recovery — they are low-grade torque sessions masquerading as easy days. Keep cadence at 90+ rpm on recovery rides. The low muscular force per stroke is the entire point of recovery spinning.

The Cadence You Choose vs the Cadence You Default To

The distinction matters more than the number itself. A rider who self-selects 85 rpm after deliberately training the range from 55 to 120 rpm is making an informed choice — their nervous system has been exposed to the full spectrum, and 85 rpm is where their physiology produces power most efficiently for the given effort. That is a trained cadence.

A rider who self-selects 85 rpm because they have never pedalled at any other speed is not choosing — they are defaulting. The number might be the same. The resilience behind it is not. When the race goes uphill, when the gradient changes, when fatigue forces cadence down in the final hour, the trained rider has options. The defaulting rider has a single setting and a hope that it holds.

Train the range. Use the drills. Let your self-selected cadence emerge from competence, not from habit.

Key Takeaways

  • Cadence is a motor skill, not a fixed trait — it responds to structured training like any other aspect of cycling fitness
  • High-cadence drills (100–120 rpm) build the neuromuscular coordination that makes race-pace pedalling smooth and efficient
  • Low-cadence torque intervals (50–65 rpm) recruit Type II fibres aerobically, building climbing-specific muscular endurance
  • World Tour coaches — Wakefield, Kerrison, Lorang — treat cadence as a periodised training variable, not a personal preference
  • Match cadence to terrain and effort: 88–95 rpm flat, 75–85 rpm climbing, 90–100 rpm threshold, 95–105 rpm VO2max
  • Masters cyclists should default to 85–95 rpm for joint protection and include deliberate high-cadence work to maintain neuromuscular speed
  • The Froome-Contador divide was never as binary as it appeared — both trained the full spectrum and shifted cadence tactically
  • Start cadence training with spin-ups, progress to structured blocks over six weeks, and track average cadence to measure transfer
  • Run your baseline through the cadence calculator before you start and check power zones for intensity targets
  • Build cadence-specific intervals using the interval builder and monitor heart rate zones during high-cadence work
  • For the complementary guide on what cadence to target, see the optimal cadence guide
  • For low-cadence specifics, see torque intervals: the study that proved the coaches right
  • For age-specific considerations, see cadence by age for masters cyclists
  • For climbing-specific cadence advice, see best cadence for climbing
  • Hill repeats are the natural companion session — see the hill repeats training guide
  • If you want cadence work programmed into a structured plan around your week, NDY coaching at Roadman writes that. The application is where the conversation starts
  • Got a specific question about your own cadence, drill selection, or how to integrate this into your current training? Ask Roadman for an answer drawn from the coach and physiologist conversations on the podcast

Train With Riders Who Think About This Stuff

The Roadman Cycling community on Skool is where serious amateurs share session data, discuss training approaches, and hold each other accountable through structured blocks like this one. If you have just read 3,500 words about cadence drills and thought "I should actually do these," you are the kind of rider the community was built for. The conversation is already happening. Come and add to it.

FAQ

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

What is the best cadence for cycling?
There is no single best number. Most trained cyclists perform well at 85-95 rpm on flat terrain, dropping to 75-85 rpm on sustained climbs. The right cadence for you depends on your muscle fibre composition, training history, and the specific effort. Train a range rather than chasing a fixed number.
Do high-cadence drills actually improve performance?
Yes. High-cadence drills build neuromuscular coordination, reduce energy waste from pedalling asymmetry, and teach your nervous system to fire more efficiently at race-pace cadences. They are a staple of World Tour pre-season programmes for good reason.
Is low-cadence training bad for your knees?
Low-cadence torque work at moderate power is safe for most cyclists when dosed correctly — two sessions per week with adequate recovery. Problems arise when riders grind at low cadence and high power without building up gradually, or when an existing knee issue is aggravated by the higher per-stroke forces.
Should older cyclists pedal at a higher cadence?
Generally yes. Higher cadence reduces peak force per pedal stroke, which is easier on ageing joints and tendons. Masters cyclists also benefit from deliberate high-cadence drills to maintain the neuromuscular speed that naturally declines with age.
What cadence should I use when climbing?
Most riders climb best at 75-85 rpm on sustained gradients, with brief drops to 65-70 rpm on steep pitches. Grinding below 60 rpm depletes glycogen faster and fatigues the quadriceps sooner. If you find yourself regularly below 70 rpm on climbs, consider an easier gear ratio.

KEEP READING — THE SATURDAY SPIN

The week's training takeaways, pro insights, and what to do about them. 30,000+ serious cyclists open it every Saturday.

NOT DONE YET

GET THE MASTERS TRAINING CHECKLIST

The 12-point checklist we use with masters athletes — recovery, strength, hormonal context, and the sessions that still move the needle in your 40s and 50s.

AW

ANTHONY WALSH

Host of the Roadman Cycling Podcast