Most cyclists have a cadence. Few have trained it. There is a material difference between self-selecting 82 rpm because that is where your legs settled ten years ago and choosing 92 rpm because your neuromuscular system can produce power there efficiently. The first is a habit. The second is a skill — and skills respond to practice.
The optimal cadence guide covers how cadence changes with workload, terrain and rider. This post is about something different: how to practise a wider cadence range so you have options when the road demands them. High-cadence spin-ups can rehearse coordination. Low-cadence work can train force production at a specific power. Neither end of the range is automatically superior.
Run your current numbers through the cadence calculator before you start. You need a baseline — not because one number defines you, but because you cannot train a range if you do not know where you are starting from.
Why Cadence Is a Trainable Skill
Cadence is not a fixed trait. It is a motor pattern — a learned coordination between your central nervous system, your muscle fibres, and the mechanical system of the bicycle. Change the input signals and the pattern changes with them.
The nervous system controls how many motor units fire, how quickly they fire, and how smoothly the left and right legs alternate through the pedal stroke. A rider who has only ever pedalled at 78 rpm has a nervous system calibrated for 78 rpm. Ask that rider to hold 105 rpm for two minutes and the result is predictable: the hips bounce, the upper body rocks, the power trace looks like a seismograph. Not because the legs cannot move that fast, but because the neural wiring has not been trained to coordinate at that speed.
This is the distinction that matters. Cardiovascular fitness determines how much oxygen you can deliver. Muscular strength determines how much force you can produce. But neuromuscular efficiency — how cleanly and economically your nervous system orchestrates the pedal stroke — determines how much of that fitness and strength actually reaches the pedals. Train it, and the same engine produces more usable power. Ignore it, and you leave watts on the table at every cadence outside your narrow comfort zone.
What the World Tour Coaches Prescribe
The best coaches in professional cycling treat cadence as a variable to be trained, not a number to be fixed. John Wakefield — founder of Science to Sport and Director of Coaching and Sports Science at Red Bull–Bora–Hansgrohe — programmes specific cadence blocks into his riders' periodisation. The intent is not to find one ideal RPM but to widen the range within which a rider can produce power efficiently.
Tim Kerrison's work with Team Sky (now Ineos Grenadiers) took this further during the Froome era. Froome's high-cadence climbing style — 95–100 rpm up Alpine passes where rivals sat at 75–80 — was not some innate preference. It was trained. Kerrison identified that Froome's physiology responded better to cardiovascular loading than to muscular loading, then built a cadence-specific programme around that finding. The result was a climbing style that looked effortless at RPMs that would have most amateurs gasping within three minutes.
Dan Lorang, who has worked with some of the strongest climbers in the modern peloton, has spoken about prescribing low-cadence torque work during base phases specifically to develop the muscular endurance that riders need when the gradient forces cadence down. His approach is pragmatic: train the ends of the spectrum deliberately, and the middle — where racing happens — takes care of itself.
The common thread across all three coaches is this: cadence work is prescribed, periodised, and progressed, not left to chance.
Cadence Ranges by Terrain and Effort Type
Before you design cadence-specific sessions, you need a framework for what to target and when. This is not prescriptive — individual variation matters — but it reflects the ranges that most trained cyclists operate within.
Flat and rolling terrain
Target: 88–95 rpm at endurance to tempo intensity. This is the bread and butter. Most riders should spend the bulk of their training hours here. If you are consistently below 85 rpm on flat roads, your default cadence is probably too low, and you are burning through muscular endurance that you will want later in the ride. Use the cadence calculator to compare your current average against the target range for your riding profile.
Sustained climbs (5–20 minutes)
Target: 75–85 rpm, depending on gradient and gearing. Cadence drops naturally as the road tilts up — gravity slows the wheel, the gear gets harder, and each pedal stroke demands more force. The mistake most amateurs make is letting cadence drop too far. Grinding at 60 rpm on a 6% gradient is not economical; it is a muscular endurance leak. If your gearing does not let you hold 75 rpm on your local climbs, the fix is a wider-range cassette, not more suffering. For the full picture on climbing RPM, see the best cadence for climbing guide.
Threshold and VO2max intervals
Target: 90–100 rpm for threshold work; 95–105 rpm for VO2max efforts. Higher power outputs suit slightly higher cadences because the alternative — the same power at lower cadence — means very high force per stroke, which fatigues Type II fibres rapidly. Know your power zones and match cadence to intensity.
Sprinting and short accelerations
Target: 110–130 rpm. Sprint power is a product of force and velocity. The ability to sustain a high cadence under maximal force — without the pedal stroke falling apart — separates riders who can sprint from riders who just push a big gear. This is almost entirely a neuromuscular skill.
High-Cadence Drills: Building Neuromuscular Speed
High-cadence work trains three things simultaneously: the speed at which motor units fire, the smoothness of the transition between left and right leg, and the stability of the pelvis at RPMs above your normal range. All three contribute to what coaches call pedalling efficiency — and all three degrade with age if they are not specifically maintained.
Session 1: Spin-Ups
Where: Flat road or trainer, small gear. Protocol: From a comfortable cadence (~90 rpm), gradually increase RPM over 30 seconds until you reach the point where your hips begin to bounce. Hold that cadence for 5 seconds, then ease off. Recovery: 2 minutes easy spinning. Repeats: 6–8. Objective: Find and gradually extend your ceiling. Most riders discover their bounce point sits around 115–120 rpm initially. After four weeks of consistent spin-ups, that ceiling often moves above 130 rpm.
Session 2: High-Cadence Blocks
Where: Flat road or trainer, moderate gear. Protocol: 1 minute at 105–110 rpm, followed by 1 minute at self-selected cadence. Alternate for 10–20 minutes within an endurance ride. Power: Zone 2 — this is not a power session. The constraint is cadence, not watts. Heart rate: Expect heart rate to sit 5–8 bpm higher than normal at the same power. That is the cardiovascular cost of spinning faster. It settles as coordination improves. Objective: Build the ability to sustain elevated cadence without the upper body compensating. If your shoulders are rising or your hips are rocking, the cadence is too high for your current coordination. Drop 5 rpm and build from there.
Session 3: Over-Under Cadence Intervals
Where: Flat road or trainer. Protocol: 2 minutes at 100–105 rpm, then 2 minutes at 75–80 rpm. Alternate for 20 minutes. Power: Steady tempo (76–90% FTP). Use the FTP zone calculator for your numbers. Objective: Train the nervous system to shift between cadence ranges without losing pedalling quality. This is the session that transfers most directly to racing, where the road and the bunch dictate constant cadence changes.
Progression over 6 weeks
Weeks 1–2: Spin-ups only (Session 1), twice per week. Learning the movement pattern. Weeks 3–4: Add high-cadence blocks (Session 2), once per week within an endurance ride. Continue spin-ups. Weeks 5–6: Introduce over-under cadence intervals (Session 3), once per week. Drop spin-ups to once per week as a warm-up drill.
Low-Cadence Torque Work: Building Muscular Strength on the Bike
At the other end of the spectrum, low-cadence torque intervals increase crank torque per stroke at a specified power. In a 2024 trial, 24 well-trained female cyclists aged 17–20 completed a demanding eight-week polarised programme. The low-cadence group performed maximal sprints at 50–60 rpm and four-minute intervals at 90–100% of maximal aerobic power at 60–70 rpm. Its group-average improvements were larger, but the authors warned that the small sample was not representative of the general training population. That programme is evidence to study—not a default amateur workout.
Session 4: Seated Torque Intervals
Where: A safe climb or a trainer setup from which you can stop promptly. The research did not compare outdoor riding with trainers. Protocol: 2–3 × 4 minutes at 60–70 rpm, seated and controlled. Power: Begin at tempo-to-low-threshold rather than copying the research programme's maximal-aerobic-power load. Recovery: 4 minutes easy spinning back down. Repeats: 2–3 initially. Objective: Test tolerance and control under higher torque. The proposed motor-unit mechanism is plausible but was not directly measured in the 2024 trial.
Session 5: An optional later progression
Where: A longer climb (10+ minutes) at 4–7%. Protocol: 8 minutes at 60–70 rpm, RPE 6–7/10. Power: 80–90% FTP. Recovery: 5 minutes easy. Repeats: 2 initially. Objective: Progress duration only after shorter efforts can be repeated without pain, position loss or next-day disruption. Use it instead of the shorter session, not as a second compulsory torque day.
The progression (and the warning)
Start at the higher end of the cadence range and change only one variable—duration, repetitions, power or cadence—at a time. There is no evidence-based universal progression or weekly frequency. Stop when pain develops or movement quality deteriorates; persistent pain, swelling, weakness, altered sensation or loss of function needs qualified assessment. The cadence-by-age guide covers why age alone does not prescribe a target.
The Contador-Froome Divide: Spinner vs Grinder on Climbs
The image persists: Froome spinning at 100 rpm up Ventoux while Contador drives a bigger gear at 70 rpm. Spinner versus grinder. Choose your camp.
Except neither rider was locked into one style. Telemetry from professional races tells a more nuanced story. Froome's average climbing cadence on long Alpine stages sat around 93–97 rpm — high, but not the 100+ that television close-ups suggested. On steep pitches above 10%, he dropped to 80–85 rpm. On accelerations, he sometimes surged above 105 rpm to create separation, using the cardiovascular burst that high cadence demands as a weapon against rivals who were already muscularly fatigued.
Contador's climbing cadence averaged 80–88 rpm on most stages — lower than Froome, but not the slow grind of popular memory. On his famous attacks — the explosive, out-of-the-saddle surges — his cadence spiked above 95 rpm. The image of Contador grinding away is partly an artefact of where cameras pointed.
The lesson for amateurs is not that one style is superior. It is that both riders had trained the full spectrum and deployed different cadences tactically. Froome chose high cadence because Kerrison had identified it as physiologically optimal for him. Contador preferred a lower baseline but shifted when the race demanded it. Neither was a prisoner of a single RPM.
What you can take from this: if you can only produce power cleanly at one cadence, you have a vulnerability. A steep ramp forces cadence down. A flat false-flat after a summit rewards those who can spin back up quickly. The rider who can operate at 75 rpm and 100 rpm — and transition between them without losing power — has more tactical options than the rider who is tethered to 82 rpm regardless of terrain.
Cadence and Knee Health for Masters Cyclists
If you are over 40, cadence remains a performance and load-management variable. At a given power, fewer revolutions require more crank torque per stroke. A small modelling study found higher peak patellofemoral compression at 70 than 90 rpm in one condition, while other knee-force measures did not all materially change. It cannot predict injury for an individual rider.
The relevant decision therefore includes symptoms, prior injury, position, gearing, power, training history and recovery—not a birthday or a claim that every rider's cartilage follows the same timeline.
This does not mean avoiding all low-cadence work. It means a masters rider should earn the session through a defined purpose, conservative exposure and a clean response. Current evidence does not support prescribing 85–95 rpm to every older rider as joint protection.
There is a second age-related consideration. Neuromuscular speed — the rate at which your nervous system can fire motor units — declines from your late thirties onward if it is not maintained through specific training. A masters cyclist who never does high-cadence work will find, gradually, that their comfortable cadence drifts downward year on year. Not because of fitness loss, but because the neural pathways that support fast, coordinated pedalling are atrophying from disuse. High-cadence spin-ups once or twice a week are the antidote. Think of them as neural maintenance — the cycling equivalent of keeping your reaction times sharp.
Cadence on the Trainer vs the Road
A brief note on where to do this work, because it matters more than most riders assume.
High-cadence drills transfer well to the trainer. The controlled resistance and fixed position make it easier to isolate the coordination challenge without worrying about traffic or road surface. Spin-ups on a smart trainer with cadence display are an efficient use of a 60-minute indoor session during the week — and the complete indoor training setup guide covers how to get your pain cave dialled so those sessions run smoothly.
The 2024 low-cadence trial used outdoor climbs, but it did not compare outdoor training with a trainer. A climb offers natural resistance but adds traffic, gearing and gradient constraints. Resistance or slope mode lets the rider control power and cadence together. ERG mode can become difficult if cadence falls because resistance rises to preserve power. Use the environment that allows the prescription to be repeated and stopped safely.
Putting It Together: A Cadence Training Block
Here is how cadence work fits into a typical training week for a masters cyclist riding eight to twelve hours. This is not a standalone programme — it layers into your existing structure alongside endurance rides, interval sessions, and recovery.
Weekly structure (build phase)
Monday: Rest or active recovery. Tuesday: Key session — torque intervals (Session 4). Warm up 20 minutes, then begin with 2–3 × 4 minutes at 60–70 rpm and a controlled tempo-to-low-threshold effort, with 4 minutes recovery. Cool down 15 minutes. Wednesday: Endurance ride with high-cadence blocks embedded (Session 2). 90 minutes Zone 2 with 6 × 1 minute at 105–110 rpm interspersed every 12–15 minutes. Thursday: Recovery spin or rest. Friday: Key session — over-under cadence intervals (Session 3). After 20-minute warm-up, alternate 2 minutes at 100 rpm / 2 minutes at 75 rpm for 20 minutes at tempo power. Follow with steady endurance to fill the ride. Saturday: Long endurance ride, self-selected cadence. Pay attention to where cadence sits naturally — this tells you whether the drill work is transferring. Sunday: Group ride or moderate intensity. Use climbing sections to practise holding 75–85 rpm rather than letting cadence drop below 70 rpm.
What to measure
Track three numbers across the block:
- Average cadence on endurance rides. If it drifts upward by 3–5 rpm over six weeks without conscious effort, the neuromuscular work is transferring.
- Spin-up ceiling. The RPM at which your hips start to bounce during Session 1 drills. Progress here means improved coordination.
- Power at low cadence. Can you hold the same percentage of FTP at 55 rpm as at 90 rpm? If the gap narrows, your torque capacity is improving. Check both numbers against the power-speed calculator to see how that translates on the road.
Common Mistakes
Treating cadence drills as power sessions. High-cadence blocks at Zone 2 are not easy because the power is low — they are hard because the coordination demand is high. Adding power on top of that defeats the purpose. Separate the stimulus: cadence work trains the nervous system, not the engine.
Skipping the progression on torque work. Starting at 50 rpm in week one because "lower is better" needlessly increases the force challenge. Begin conservatively and change one dose variable at a time.
Only training one end of the spectrum. A rider who does nothing but spin-ups develops coordination without strength. A rider who does nothing but torque intervals develops force without the neural speed to use it at race cadence. You need both.
Ignoring cadence on recovery rides. Recovery rides at 60–70 rpm in a big gear are not recovery — they are low-grade torque sessions masquerading as easy days. Keep cadence at 90+ rpm on recovery rides. The low muscular force per stroke is the entire point of recovery spinning.
The Cadence You Choose vs the Cadence You Default To
The distinction matters more than the number itself. A rider who self-selects 85 rpm after deliberately training the range from 55 to 120 rpm is making an informed choice — their nervous system has been exposed to the full spectrum, and 85 rpm is where their physiology produces power most efficiently for the given effort. That is a trained cadence.
A rider who self-selects 85 rpm because they have never pedalled at any other speed is not choosing — they are defaulting. The number might be the same. The resilience behind it is not. When the race goes uphill, when the gradient changes, when fatigue forces cadence down in the final hour, the trained rider has options. The defaulting rider has a single setting and a hope that it holds.
Train the range. Use the drills. Let your self-selected cadence emerge from competence, not from habit.
Key Takeaways
- Cadence is a motor skill, not a fixed trait — it responds to structured training like any other aspect of cycling fitness
- High-cadence drills (100–120 rpm) build the neuromuscular coordination that makes race-pace pedalling smooth and efficient
- Low-cadence torque work raises torque per stroke; its research results and proposed mechanisms must stay attached to the tested protocol and population
- World Tour coaches — Wakefield, Kerrison, Lorang — treat cadence as a periodised training variable, not a personal preference
- Match cadence to terrain and effort: 88–95 rpm flat, 75–85 rpm climbing, 90–100 rpm threshold, 95–105 rpm VO2max
- Masters cyclists should choose cadence from the task, gearing, symptoms and sustainable effort rather than a universal age rule
- The Froome-Contador divide was never as binary as it appeared — both trained the full spectrum and shifted cadence tactically
- Start cadence training with spin-ups, progress to structured blocks over six weeks, and track average cadence to measure transfer
- Run your baseline through the cadence calculator before you start and check power zones for intensity targets
- Build cadence-specific intervals using the interval builder and monitor heart rate zones during high-cadence work
- For the complementary guide on what cadence to target, see the optimal cadence guide
- For low-cadence specifics, see the evidence and torque-session guide
- For age-specific considerations, see cadence by age for masters cyclists
- For climbing-specific cadence advice, see best cadence for climbing
- Hill repeats are the natural companion session — see the hill repeats training guide
- If you want cadence work programmed into a structured plan around your week, NDY coaching at Roadman writes that. The application is where the conversation starts
- Got a specific question about your own cadence, drill selection, or how to integrate this into your current training? Ask Roadman for an answer drawn from the coach and physiologist conversations on the podcast
Train With Riders Who Think About This Stuff
The Roadman Cycling community on Skool is where serious amateurs share session data, discuss training approaches, and hold each other accountable through structured blocks like this one. If you have just read 3,500 words about cadence drills and thought "I should actually do these," you are the kind of rider the community was built for. The conversation is already happening. Come and add to it.