Skip to content
Coaching24 min read

TOUR OF CAMBRIDGESHIRE TRAINING GUIDE: HOW TO PREPARE FOR THE UK'S UCI GRAN FONDO QUALIFIER

By anthony-walsh

WHO THIS IS FOR

IS THIS YOU?

  • Cyclists entered for the Tour of Cambridgeshire who want a race-specific build focused on wind, echelons, and sustained power, not generic sportive preparation
  • Riders chasing a UCI Gran Fondo World Championship qualification time and needing to understand the pace and tactics of the front groups
  • Anyone at 3.0-3.5+ W/kg who has trained for hilly events and wants to know why flat, wind-exposed racing demands different fitness
  • Group riders wanting to sharpen echelon skills and aero positioning before a fast, exposed event

THE ROADMAN VIEW

The Roadman View

  • I think this is the event where echelon skills matter more than FTP. I have seen the Fens split groups inside the first 30km — the crosswind is relentless and if you cannot hold a position in an echelon, you lose the wheel and spend the rest of the event riding solo into a headwind at 32km/h. I can tell you from experience, that is a miserable day.
  • I have noticed the riders who finish at the front are not the strongest — they are the smartest. They save energy in the group, they know when to fight and when to sit, and they have practised riding in crosswinds before race day. I believe fitness gets you to the start line, but positioning gets you to the finish.
  • I am convinced that a 5-watt aero saving compounded over 3 hours at 40km/h is worth more than the 5-watt FTP gain you might squeeze from another interval block. I tell riders that deeper-section wheels, a sustainable aero position, and the right tyre pressure matter more here than at any mountain sportive.

The Tour of Cambridgeshire is the only UK event where you can qualify for the UCI Gran Fondo World Championship. That single fact reshapes everything about how it rides. The field is fast. The front groups average 40-44km/h. The riders lining up at the sharp end are not sportive tourists rolling through the countryside for a medal and a massage — they are chasing qualification times, racing in age-group packs, and treating every crosswind section as a selection point. If you have trained for mountain events where the climbing sorts the field, this is a different sport.

The course itself looks harmless. 128 kilometres on closed roads through the Cambridgeshire Fens. Roughly 300 metres of total climbing. An elevation profile so flat it could pass for a heart-rate trace on a rest day. No switchbacks, no Alpine passes, no category climbs. A handful of short rises around village approaches and that is it. On paper, it is one of the easiest one-day events in the UK calendar.

On the road, it is a three-hour fight with the wind. The Fens are dead flat, fully exposed, and the wind that crosses those open agricultural plains is relentless. No hedgerows, no tree lines, no terrain features to break it up. Just straight roads stretching to the horizon with a crosswind that splits groups, drags solo riders backwards, and turns an aerobically strong cyclist into a 32km/h time triallist if they cannot hold a wheel. The riders who finish at the front of this event are not the strongest. They are the smartest. They ride in echelons, they save energy in the group, and they know when to fight and when to sit.

Key Takeaways

  • The Tour of Cambridgeshire is 128km on closed roads through the Cambridgeshire Fens with barely 300m of climbing — the difficulty is not elevation, it is wind, exposure, and the relentless pace of a UCI-qualified field
  • As the UK's only UCI Gran Fondo World Championship qualifier, the event attracts a stronger-than-average field. The front groups ride at 40-44km/h and the pace fractures the field on the first crosswind section
  • Echelon riding is not optional. On open Fenland roads with a 30km/h crosswind, the bunch splits into diagonal lines and riders who cannot hold position lose the wheel and ride solo into the wind for the remaining 80km
  • Target 3.5 W/kg for a front-group finish and UCI qualification time. 3.0 W/kg finishes comfortably in the second or third group. Below 2.8 W/kg, the wind makes the event significantly harder without shelter
  • Flat does not mean easy. Riding 128km at 38-40km/h on exposed roads demands sustained aerobic power, muscular endurance in an aero position, and the ability to hold 4-5 W/kg surges when the crosswind splits the group
  • A 12-week build emphasising sustained tempo work, group riding skills, and time trial position comfort prepares you for an event where aerodynamic efficiency saves more watts than any interval session
  • Tyre choice and bike position matter more here than at any mountain sportive. A 5-watt aero saving compounded over 3 hours at 40km/h is worth more than the 5-watt FTP gain you might squeeze from another interval block

What the Tour of Cambridgeshire Actually Demands

The numbers first. 128 kilometres. Approximately 300-400 metres of total elevation gain. Closed roads the entire distance. Front-group finishing time of 3-3.5 hours. Mid-pack finishing time of 3.5-4 hours. Entry around $90-130.

A front-group finish requires sustained power of 3.5 W/kg or better, the ability to hold 4-5 W/kg surges for 30-60 seconds when the bunch accelerates out of turns or through crosswind sections, and — this is the part most riders miss — the skill to sit in a sheltered position for 80-90% of the race while expending as little energy as possible. A 75kg rider at 3.5 W/kg produces 262 watts. In a sheltered group position on flat roads, that same rider needs only 180-200 watts to hold 40km/h. The difference between 262 watts and 190 watts over three hours is the difference between finishing on empty and finishing with reserves. That difference is positioning.

At 3.0 W/kg, you finish comfortably in the second or third group — 36-38km/h average, solid mid-pack, a respectable ride. Below 2.8 W/kg, the event changes character. You lose shelter earlier, ride more time exposed to the wind, and the effort required to hold even 34km/h solo on Fenland roads with a crosswind is significantly higher than the same speed in the shelter of a group. Flat events are brutally unforgiving to solo riders because there is no gradient to equalise the field. On a mountain, a 2.5 W/kg rider just goes slower uphill. On the Fens in a crosswind, a 2.5 W/kg rider who loses the group goes from saving 30% of their energy in the draft to spending 30% more fighting the wind. The maths is punishing.

The Fenland Problem: Wind as the Course

Mountain sportives have a clear hierarchy. You look at the elevation profile, count the climbs, estimate the duration, and train accordingly. The Tour of Cambridgeshire has no elevation profile worth discussing. What it has is wind.

The Cambridgeshire Fens are former marshland reclaimed for agriculture over centuries. The landscape is flat — completely, unrelentingly flat. Fields stretch unbroken for kilometres. The roads cut straight lines across open terrain with nothing taller than a drainage pump to interrupt the airflow. When the wind blows — and in June, it nearly always blows — there is zero shelter on the road.

A 20km/h crosswind on an exposed Fenland road adds roughly 30-50 watts to the power cost of maintaining 38km/h compared to still conditions, depending on the rider's frontal area and position. A 30km/h crosswind — common on exposed fen roads in an English summer — can add 60-80 watts. Over three hours, that is the difference between a comfortable ride and a survival exercise.

But the watt cost is only half the problem. The tactical cost is where the event truly separates riders. In a crosswind, a peloton does not ride in a straight line behind a single leader. It rides in echelons — diagonal lines that angle across the road, each rider positioning themselves slightly downwind of the rider ahead to maximise the wind shadow. A well-organised echelon of 15-20 riders can maintain 40km/h at the same effort that a solo rider produces 34km/h. The shelter effect in crosswinds is larger than in headwinds because the wind shadow extends to the side rather than directly behind.

When the wind shifts or the pace lifts, the echelon can only accommodate a fixed number of riders across the road width. The rest — the riders who could not hold position, reacted too slowly, or sat in the wrong part of the bunch — are left in the gutter. They form a second echelon. Then a third. Each successive group rides harder for less speed because they have fewer riders to share the work. By the time the field has passed through one serious crosswind section, it has splintered into fragments, and the gaps between them rarely close on flat roads.

This is the defining mechanism of the Tour of Cambridgeshire. The course does not split the field with a hill. It splits the field with wind.

Course Analysis

Start to the Fens (km 0-25)

The opening kilometres roll out from the Peterborough/Ely area on relatively sheltered roads. Groups are dense, the pace is nervous, and the road narrows through villages with short rises and tight corners. The effort should feel controlled. The objective is simple: find a group that matches your target pace and settle into position.

What most riders do wrong is start too far back or in the wrong group. If you are targeting a front-group finish and UCI qualification, you need to be in the first or second group from the gun. If the field fractures at km 30 and you are in the third group, you are not closing that gap on flat roads with a crosswind. Positioning matters before the race, in the start pen, and in the first 20 kilometres.

Exposed Fenland Sections (km 25-90)

This is the race. Sixty-five kilometres of straight, flat, exposed Fenland roads where the crosswind hits the bunch broadside and the echelons form. The roads run along drainage channels and across open fields. There is no shelter. The group either organises into echelons or it falls apart.

The splits happen fast. A surge from the front of the group when the crosswind hits at a bad angle, a road that bends into the wind, a through-and-off line that accelerates — and suddenly a gap opens. If you are on the right side of that gap, you are in the front echelon and the race continues at a sustainable pace. If you are on the wrong side, you are chasing. On flat Fenland roads, a 10-second gap in a crosswind is nearly impossible to close without a massive solo effort. Watch the road direction. Watch the wind. Sit on the sheltered side of the bunch before the split comes.

Village Sections and Short Rises (km 90-120)

The final third of the course threads through villages around the Ely area. The roads narrow, short rises of 2-3% pitch up around village approaches, and the corners tighten. After 90km of open Fenland riding, these sections feel different — more technical, less exposed. The wind is partially blocked by buildings and hedgerows.

This is where fuelling and pacing errors surface. The rider who has been sitting in the echelon, eating consistently, and managing effort arrives at km 90 feeling strong. The rider who rode solo from km 40, fought the wind, skipped gels because they were too busy surviving — that rider is cooked. The short rises that a fresh cyclist would not notice become walls for a glycogen-depleted rider who has been grinding into the wind for two hours.

Final Kilometres (km 120-128)

The run-in to the finish. If you are in a group, the pace lifts. Positioning for the finish matters for UCI qualification because the age-group placings depend on your finishing order. Expect surges, expect the group to line out, and expect riders who have been sitting in all day to come to the front for the first time. Save a match for the last 5km. A 30-second effort at 5-6 W/kg in the final kilometre can be the difference between qualifying and missing.

Echelon Riding: The Skill That Defines Your Race

Most riders in the UK have never ridden in a proper echelon. Club chain gangs run in a straight line. Sportives are too slow for echelons to matter. Time trials are solo. The Tour of Cambridgeshire is the one UK event where echelon skills separate those who race from those who survive.

An echelon forms when the wind crosses the road at an angle. Instead of riding directly behind the wheel in front, each rider offsets slightly to the side that is sheltered from the wind. The result is a diagonal line of riders that extends across the road from the windward gutter to the leeward edge. Each rider gets wind shelter from the rider in front and slightly upwind of them.

Reading the wind. Before the event, check the forecast for wind direction and speed. On the road, watch the flags, the grass, the ripples on drainage ditches. The wind direction relative to the road determines which side of the bunch offers shelter. When the road turns and the wind angle changes, the sheltered side changes. Riders who do not read the wind end up on the exposed side of the echelon and get dropped when the pace goes up.

Holding position. In an echelon, your position is tight — 30-50cm from the rider beside you, overlapping wheels with the rider slightly ahead. This requires trust, steady bike handling, and the ability to hold a consistent speed without surging or braking. Any sudden movement disrupts the entire line. Practise this in group rides before race day. If your club runs through-and-off sessions on exposed roads, that is the closest simulation you will get.

When the echelon splits. A Fenland road is roughly 6-7 metres wide. An echelon of riders spaced 1 metre apart across the road fits 6-7 riders. If the group has 30 riders, only the first 6-7 get full shelter. The rest form a second echelon behind the first, and each successive echelon loses efficiency. When the pace lifts, the gap between echelons opens and the riders in the second or third line are left chasing. If you are in a group of 30 and the crosswind hits, your job is to be in the first seven.

What to do if you miss the split. Organise the riders around you immediately. Form a second echelon. Share the work. The worst response is to ride solo on the exposed side of the road chasing the group ahead — you will burn 40-60 watts more than any rider in the front echelon and the gap will grow. Accept the split, ride smart in your group, and limit the time lost.

12-Week Training Framework

This framework targets a rider with 6-8 hours per week of existing training volume. If you are below that, extend the base phase to 6 weeks. The emphasis throughout is sustained aerobic output, time in an aero position, and group riding skills — not peak power, not climbing, not VO2max intervals.

Weeks 1-4: Base and Position

Volume: 7-9 hours/week across 4-5 rides.

Eighty per cent of your riding at Zone 2. The remaining 20% is tempo and aero position work. The focus here is building the aerobic base to sustain 3+ hours of continuous effort and conditioning your body to hold a lower, more aerodynamic position on the bike.

Anchor session: Long ride building from 2.5 hours to 3.5 hours. Flat terrain. Include 3-4 blocks of 15-20 minutes in your most aero position — hands in the drops, elbows bent, chin low. Time how long you can hold the position before your neck, shoulders, or lower back force you upright. That number needs to reach 30+ minutes by the end of the block.

Midweek quality: One tempo session — 2x25 minutes at 82-88% FTP in the drops or on the hoods in an aero tuck. Five minutes recovery between efforts. The watt target is secondary to the position target. If you can hold 85% FTP in the drops for 25 minutes, your aero position is race-ready. If you cannot, the position needs work before the power does.

Group riding: One group ride per week. A club chain gang or a paceline session. The objective is not fitness — it is wheel-following, close-quarters riding, and through-and-off technique. If your local rides do not include structured paceline work, find one that does.

Strength: Two gym sessions per week. Bulgarian split lunges (3x10 each leg), step-ups (3x12 each leg), leg press (3x10), single-leg hip thrusts (3x12 each leg), and 15 minutes of core stability — planks, side planks, dead bugs, bird dogs. The core work is specifically for holding an aero position. A weak core collapses your torso within 20 minutes and costs you watts through aerodynamic drag. Twenty-five minutes per session. In and out.

Weeks 5-8: Build

Volume: 9-11 hours/week.

Two quality sessions per week now. The training gets specific to the demands of flat, fast, wind-exposed riding.

Session one — sustained tempo blocks: 2x30 minutes at 82-88% FTP in an aero position, building to 2x35 minutes by week 8. These are not threshold sessions. They train the muscular endurance and positional tolerance to hold a fast, steady effort for the duration of the event. Recovery between efforts is 5 minutes of easy spinning.

Session two — surge intervals: 8x1 minute at 120-130% FTP with 2 minutes recovery, done within a 90-minute aerobic ride. These simulate the accelerations that happen when an echelon reforms, a crosswind splits the group, or the pace lifts through a village section. You do not need to sustain this power — you need to match the surge, close the gap, and then settle back into sustainable tempo. The ability to spike and recover is the specific fitness demand of flat, tactical racing.

Long ride: Building from 3.5 hours to 4.5 hours on the flattest, most exposed roads you can find. Include group riding where possible. If you can ride on exposed coastal roads or fenland-style terrain, do it. Practise riding in crosswinds. Practise sitting in. Practise eating and drinking without sitting up.

Gym: Reduce to once per week. Same movements, lower volume. Maintain the core work — the aero position sessions on the bike are now doing the primary conditioning, but the gym work keeps the stabilisers functional.

Weeks 9-11: Peak and Race Simulation

Volume: 10-12 hours/week at the peak, then tapering.

Session one — race-pace simulation: 3x20 minutes at 88-92% FTP in an aero position. This is the sustained effort of sitting near the front of a fast group for 60 minutes of a 3-hour race. Five minutes easy spinning between efforts. If you can hold 90% FTP in the drops for three 20-minute blocks, you can hold the wheel of any group at the Tour of Cambridgeshire.

Session two — group ride at race pace: Join the fastest group ride you have access to. Ride in the wheels. Practise echelon positioning. Practise the through-and-off line. Do not pull at the front for glory — sit in, save energy, and focus on the tactical elements. This session is about skills, not watts.

Race simulation ride (week 10 or 11): One ride of 100-130km on flat, exposed roads at race pace. Full fuelling rehearsal. Full kit rehearsal. Ride the first 30km at 65-70% FTP in a group. Then ride 60km at 80-88% FTP, alternating between aero position blocks and group riding. Finish with 3x2 minutes at 120% FTP simulating a finishing-sprint effort. This ride answers the question: can you hold your position, your power, and your nutrition for three hours on flat roads?

Week 12: Taper

Volume drops 40-50%. Three to four rides across the week. Each shorter than usual. Two rides include 3x3 minutes at threshold — short openers that keep the neuromuscular system primed without accumulating fatigue.

Monday: easy spin or rest. Tuesday: 60 minutes with 3x3 minutes at 95-100% FTP. Wednesday: rest. Thursday: 45 minutes easy. Friday: rest. Saturday: 30 minutes easy spin with 3x30-second accelerations. Sunday: race day. The fitness is in. You cannot gain anything meaningful in the final week. You can lose the event by training too hard.

Key Sessions

1. Aero Tempo Blocks

2x30 minutes at 82-88% FTP in an aero position — drops or hoods with a flat back, elbows bent, chin tucked. Five minutes easy spinning between blocks. Start with 2x20 minutes in weeks 1-4 and build to 2x35 minutes by week 8. The objective is not just power — it is power in the position you will hold on race day. If you train sitting upright and race in the drops, your body will rebel at km 60.

Duration: 75-90 minutes including warm-up and cool-down.

2. Surge-and-Settle Intervals

8x1 minute at 120-130% FTP with 2 minutes at 65% FTP recovery. Embedded in a 90-minute endurance ride. These replicate the accelerations of echelon racing — the 45-second effort when the group splits and you must close a 3-second gap or lose the wheel for good. The recovery interval trains the ability to spike and then immediately return to sustainable power without blowing up. This is the session that prepares you for the tactical surges of flat, fast group riding.

3. Crosswind Practice Ride

Find the most exposed flat road within riding distance. Coastal roads, marsh roads, fenland roads. Ride it in a group. Practise through-and-off with the wind at an angle. Switch sides depending on wind direction. If the wind is from the left, the sheltered line runs to the right of the road. Practise the spacing, the overlap, the trust required to hold 30cm from the rider beside you at 38km/h. This cannot be replicated on a turbo trainer. This cannot be replicated solo. It requires a group and it requires wind.

Duration: 2-3 hours with the group section being 60-90 minutes.

4. Group Ride Race Simulation

Join a fast, organised club ride — 60-90 minutes of structured paceline or through-and-off at 36-40km/h. Sit in the wheels for the first 30 minutes. Take a pull of 1-2 minutes when your turn comes. Focus entirely on smoothness: no surges on the front, no braking in the line, no gaps opening when the rider ahead accelerates. The riders who win at the Tour of Cambridgeshire are not the riders who pull hardest. They are the riders who hold their position with the least wasted energy.

Aerodynamics, Equipment, and Bike Setup

On a flat course where aerodynamic drag accounts for roughly 90% of the total resistance at 40km/h, every watt you save through drag reduction is a watt you do not have to produce. This is the one event where equipment choices matter more than fitness choices at the margin.

Wheels. Deeper-section rims — 40-60mm — reduce drag measurably at speeds above 35km/h. On the Fens, where the average speed in the front group exceeds 40km/h, a set of 50mm carbon clinchers saves 5-10 watts over shallow box-section rims. That is a larger gain than most riders extract from a month of training. If you own deep wheels or can borrow them, this is the event to use them. Be aware that very deep rims (80mm+) can feel unstable in strong crosswinds — 50-60mm is the sweet spot for the Fens.

Position. Get as low as you can sustain for three hours. Narrow your elbows. Drop your chin. Close the gap between your torso and the top tube. A proper bike fit with an aero focus — not just a comfort fit — is worth the investment for this event. The power-to-speed calculator will show you exactly how many watts a 2cm drop in your frontal area saves at 40km/h. The number will surprise you.

Tyres. 25-28mm at the correct pressure for your weight and the road surface. Fenland roads are generally smooth but not pristine — 28mm at 80-85 psi for a 75kg rider gives the best balance of rolling resistance and comfort over three hours. Do not run 23mm tyres pumped to 110 psi. The rolling resistance is higher, the comfort is lower, and the risk of puncture on rough Fen road sections is unnecessary.

Clothing. Tight-fitting jersey and bib shorts. No flapping material. A skinsuit is worth 5-10 watts at 40km/h if the fit is right. For a June event in the UK, conditions should sit between 14 and 22 degrees — a lightweight gilet in the back pocket handles morning chill. Pack a rain cape if the forecast threatens. Getting cold and wet on the Fens at km 80 with no shelter for 20km is a performance disaster.

Helmet. An aero road helmet saves 3-5 watts at 40km/h compared to a heavily vented climbing helmet. On this course, that adds up. You are not climbing in the heat. You are riding at speed in a crosswind. Ventilation is secondary to aerodynamics.

Nutrition and Fuelling

The Tour of Cambridgeshire is a shorter event than most mountain sportives — 3-4 hours rather than 6-8. That changes the fuelling equation.

Pre-race evening: Standard carbohydrate loading. 8-10g of carbohydrate per kilogram of body weight across the 24 hours before the event. Rice, pasta, potatoes. For a 75kg rider, that is 600-750g of carbs through the day. Nothing exotic. Nothing new.

Race morning: Breakfast 3 hours before the start. Porridge, toast with jam, a banana, coffee. 100-150g of carbohydrate. The same breakfast you eat before long training rides. Race day is not the time to experiment.

On the bike: Start eating within the first 20 minutes. 60-80g of carbohydrate per hour from the gun. The event may only last 3 hours, but those 3 hours are at a higher intensity than most sportives — 75-85% FTP sustained, with surges into threshold territory. Energy expenditure is 800-1,000 calories per hour for the front group. The flat profile masks the effort because there are no descents for recovery and no climbs that force you to slow down. You are burning fuel continuously. Gels are the most efficient delivery mechanism for a short, high-intensity event — two to three gels per hour, alternating with small sips of electrolyte drink.

Caffeine: A caffeinated gel at km 80-90. The caffeine peaks 20-30 minutes later, which puts the performance window right across the finishing kilometres where the pace lifts and the tactical surges intensify. One dose of 3mg per kilogram of body weight — roughly 200mg for a 70kg rider. That is one double-caffeine gel or two standard ones.

Hydration: 500-750ml per hour. June in the UK can be warm enough to generate meaningful sweat losses, and the constant effort on flat roads offers no natural drinking opportunities where the pace drops. Drink on the flat while you can. Use the fuelling calculator to plan exact intake based on your weight and target duration.

Common Mistakes

Bringing a climbing bike. A sub-7kg carbon frame with 30mm wheels and an upright position loses you 15-25 watts at 40km/h compared to a properly set-up aero road bike. On 128km of flat road, that watt penalty costs you a group, a position, and possibly your qualification. The weight saving is irrelevant. There is nothing to climb.

Riding solo into the wind. The single most expensive mistake on the Fens. A solo rider at 38km/h in a 25km/h crosswind produces roughly 280-320 watts. The same rider in a sheltered echelon position produces 180-200 watts for the same speed. Over two hours, that is the difference between a strong finish and total depletion. If you lose the group, find another group. If there is no group, organise the riders around you. Never ride alone if there is a wheel to follow.

No echelon practice. Riders who have never ridden in an echelon before race day are the first to get dropped when the crosswind splits the bunch. Echelon riding requires close-proximity skills, trust in the rider beside you, and the ability to read wind direction — none of which can be learned from watching a video. Ten group rides in crosswinds before the event is the minimum. Five is not enough.

Wrong clothing for UK summer. June in the Fens can be 22 degrees and sunny or 14 degrees with horizontal rain. Riders who dress for the best case and get the worst case lose 10-15% of their power output to cold within 90 minutes. A gilet weighs nothing. Arm warmers weigh nothing. The performance cost of carrying them is zero. The performance cost of needing them and not having them is enormous.

Underpacing the start and losing the group. This is the reverse of the usual sportive mistake. At most mountain events, riders go too hard too early. At the Tour of Cambridgeshire, riders who ease into the opening kilometres find themselves 30 seconds behind the front group by km 20 — and on flat, exposed roads with a crosswind, that 30 seconds never comes back. Know your target group. Be in it from the gun. The first crosswind section selects who stays and who goes.

Not practising the aero position. Riders who train sitting upright and then drop into the hoods on race day develop neck pain, lower back pain, and numb hands within 60 minutes. Their power drops 10-15% compared to their trained position. Three months of progressive aero position work — starting at 10-minute blocks and building to 30+ minutes — eliminates this problem entirely.

Training Inside the Roadman Community

Inside the Roadman Cycling community on Skool we share session structures, pacing strategies, and echelon riding breakdowns for flat, tactical events like the Tour of Cambridgeshire. The aero tempo blocks and surge-and-settle intervals in this guide are drawn from the same frameworks we use with coached athletes targeting UCI qualifier events. Free to join, and the riders who have ridden the Tour of Cambridgeshire before will tell you exactly where the crosswind splits the field.

FAQ

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

How fast is the Tour of Cambridgeshire?
Front groups average 40-44km/h depending on wind conditions. The second tier sits around 36-38km/h. Mid-pack averages 33-36km/h. Solo riders without group shelter average 28-32km/h and suffer significantly more in the wind. Finishing time for the front group is approximately 3-3.5 hours. Mid-pack finishes in 3.5-4 hours.
Do I need to know how to ride in echelons?
Yes. The Fenland roads are straight and exposed. When the wind crosses the road, the bunch echelons — diagonal lines where each rider shelters from the wind at an angle. If you cannot hold a position in an echelon, you lose the wheel when the pace goes up and spend the rest of the event riding solo. Practice in group rides before race day.
Is the Tour of Cambridgeshire hilly?
No. Total climbing is approximately 300-400m across 128km. There are no classified climbs. The difficulty comes entirely from the wind and the pace. A few short rises around village approaches are the only gradient changes. Climbers who rely on hills to create gaps find no terrain advantage here.
What bike setup should I use for the Tour of Cambridgeshire?
Aero matters more than weight. A road bike with deeper-section wheels (40-60mm), an aero position that you can sustain for 3-4 hours, and 25-28mm tyres at the right pressure for the road surface. Do not bring a lightweight climbing bike. The 200g weight saving is worthless on flat roads where aerodynamic drag accounts for 90% of resistance.
Can I qualify for the UCI Gran Fondo World Championship at the Tour of Cambridgeshire?
Yes. The Tour of Cambridgeshire is the UK's only UCI Gran Fondo qualifier. Qualification is based on age-group finishing position — typically the top 25% of each age group qualify. The exact percentage varies by year and by how many World Championship spots are allocated to the event.

KEEP READING — THE SATURDAY SPIN

The week's training takeaways, pro insights, and what to do about them. 30,000+ serious cyclists open it every Saturday.

AW

ANTHONY WALSH

Host of the Roadman Cycling Podcast

RELATED CONTENT

Episode
Coaching18:14

WHY YOUR ZONE 2 TRAINING ISN'T WORKING & HOW TO FIX IT | ROADMAN CYCLING PODCAST

Zone 2 works brilliantly for some riders and leaves others stuck, tired and going nowhere. Anthony unpacks the missing context behind endurance training advice — drawing on insights from Mattias Reck, coach to Mads Pedersen — and explains why the zone is relative but the cost is absolute, and what time-crunched riders should actually do.

Episode
Coaching57:04

MADS PEDERSEN'S COACH ON THE TRAINING BEHIND A WORLD CHAMPION | ROADMAN CYCLING PODCAST

Mattias Reck has coached Mads Pedersen since 2017 — from a raw young rider into a world champion, Classics winner and Grand Tour stage hunter. He sits down with Anthony to talk about how you actually build a rider who can turn brutal racing into controlled chaos: resilience, recovery capacity, and the years it takes to learn how much training one athlete can really absorb.

with Mattias Reck

Episode
Coaching28:44

DOES AERO MATTER FOR AMATEURS? WHAT THE SCIENCE ACTUALLY SAYS | ROADMAN CYCLING PODCAST

Aero gets sold as free speed for pros, time triallists and triathletes — but does it matter for the everyday rider doing club runs and sportives? This solo episode cuts through the marketing. Your body, not your bike, makes most of the drag, which means the biggest gains are the cheapest ones: how you sit, how you hold the bars, and whether your kit actually fits. Here's when aero is real free speed, when it's expensive nonsense, and the $0 changes worth making first.